fi(x)
as an array of functions
in a variable of the type
Func<double,double>[]
for example,
var fs = new Func<double,double>[] { z => 1.0, z => z, z => z*z };
{xi, yi, δyi}i=1...n ,with a linear combination
Fc(x) ≐ ∑k=1..m ck fk(x)of given functions fk(x)|k=1..m .
Time t (days) : 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 13, 15 Activity y of ThX (relative units): 117,100,88,72,53,29.5,25.2,15.2,11.1
From this data they correctly deduced that radioactive decay follows exponentil law, y(t)=ae-λt (equation (1) in the article).
Now, assume that the incertainty δy of the measurement was determined by the last-but-one digit of the measurement,
δy: 5,5,5,5,5,5,1,1,1,1and fit the data with exponential function in the usual logarithmic way, ln(y)=ln(a)-λt. The uncertainty of the logarithm should be probably taken as δln(y)=δy/y.
Plot the experimental data (with error-bars) and your best fit.
From your fit find out the half-life time of ThX.
ThX is today known as 224Ra – compare your result with the modern value.
(3 points) Uncertainties of the fitting coefficients
• Modify you least-squares fitting function such that it also
calculates the covariance matrix and the uncertainties of the fitting
coefficients.
• Calculate the uncertainty of the half-life value for
ThX from the given data.
• Does it agree with the modern value within
the estimated uncertainty?
(1 points)
Evaluation of the quality of the uncertainties on the fit coefficients
• Plot your best fit,
∑ k=1..m
ck fk(x),
together with the fits where you change the fit coefficients by the
estimated δc, that is,
∑ k=1..m
(ck±δck) fk(x).