The non-inertial Rindler frame (apparently named after Wolfgan Rindler)
is made of constantly and uniformly accelerated clocks. The accelerations
are tuned such that if two of the clocks are connected with a solid rod,
no stresses appear in the rod in the process of motion. In other words
it is, in principle, possible to realize the Rindler frame with material
bodies. The Rindler frame is very useful as a relativistic model of a
constant uniform gravitational field. It is often used as a test-ground
for all sorts of theories. We shall see on the example of the Rindler
frame that non-inertial frames have some peculiar features: they are
curved, they have horizons, time goes differently at different places.
Consider a 1+1 dimensional inertial frame K with coordinates t,x
where x-axis is pointing up. The non-inertial frame K′ is made of
clocks which are constantly accelerating upwards. The clocks are
connected with solid rods of unit length. The bottom clock is marked
with zero and is accelerating with acceleration g. The next clock is
marked with number 1, the next with number 2 and so forth, making a
ruler to measure distances. Let us designate the time and distance in
this frame as τ,ξ and let us have at t=0 τ = 0 and x=ξ.
The relativistic equation of motion of a body accelerating with a
constant acceleration a is
d
dt
v
√
1−v2
=a ,
(1)
with the solution
x=x0+
1
a
√
1+a2t2
.
(2)
The clock at coordinate ξ accelerates with some acceleration a(ξ).
Since there are no stresses in the connecting rods the higher clock
has to accelerate a bit slower, more precisely the acceleration
must satisfy the equation da=−a2dξ (prove it). The solution is
1
a
=ξ+
1
g
,
(3)
where we have
used that a(ξ = 0)=g.
Let us choose the time τ to be the proper-time of the clocks.
Then the relativistic invariant ds2 for a given
ξ should be equal dτ2. Calculating
ds2|dξ = 0=(dt2−dx2)dξ = 0 using (2) gives
the following transformation rules:
x
=
(ξ+1/g) cosh(
τ
ξ+1/g)
)−1/g,
(4)
t
=
(ξ+1/g) sinh(
τ
(ξ+1/g)
)
(5)
ds2
=
dτ2−
2dτdξ
(ξ+
1
g
)2
−(1+
τ2
(ξ+
1
g
)2
)dξ2.
(6)
The frame is apparently curved. Let's simplify it a bit with new
coordinates gη = [(τ)/((ξ+1/g))] and ρ = ξ+1/g:
x
=
ρcosh(gη)−1/g
(7)
t
=
ρsinh(gη)
(8)
ds2
=
(gρ)2dη2 − dρ2
(9)
We notice important effects in the accelerated frame:
The Rindler coordinates are curved,
ds2 = dt2 − dx2 = (gρ)2dη2 − dρ2;
The local clock rate in the Rindler frame varies with height,
ds2|dρ = 0 = (gρ)2dη2;
The lines η = const converge towards the event
horizons - the boundaries that separate the part of the total space-time
unavailable for the observer in the elevator.
The equivalence principle tells that all these effects must as well
be present in gravitational fields.
Exercises
In the Rindler space
ds2 = (1 + gξ)2dη2 − dξ2
calculate gab, gab and Christoffel symbols;
write down the geodesic equations;
in the equations [(d2t)/(ds2)]=0, [(d2x)/(ds2)]=0 make a
variable substitution to η,ξ coordinates. Check that the
corresponding equations are equivalent to geodesic equations;
make the non-relativistic limit (c→∞) and prove,
that the geodesic equation reduces to the Newtonian non-relativistic
equation [(d2ξ)/(dη2)]=−g.
Prove that a constantly accelerating bar with length dξ must
have its ends accelerate differently with a difference da=−a2dξ.
Hint: since it accelerates, a moment later it will look shorter, thus
the lower end must be accelerating faster, than the upper end.
Explain the twins paradox from the point of view of the accelerating
observer.
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 3.77. On 2 Oct 2007, 17:51.